Co-operative Edu Tech

Sunday, 29 December 2019

First Narasimhan Committee Report – I (1991)


First Narasimhan Committee Report – 1991
Recommendations of Narasimhan Committee
1.    Establishment of 4 tier hierarchy for banking structure with 3 to 4 large banks (including SBI) at the top and at bottom rural banks engaged in agricultural activities.
2.    The supervisory functions over banks and financial institutions can be assigned to a quasi-autonomous body sponsored by RBI.
3.    A phased reduction in SLR & CRR.
4.    Phased achievement of 8% capital adequacy ratio.
5.    Abolition of branch licensing policy.
6.    Proper classification of assets and full disclosure of accounts of banks and financial institutions.
7.    Deregulation of Interest rates.
8.    Competition among financial institutions on participating approach.
 Banking Reform Measures of Government: –
On the recommendations of Narasimhan Committee, following measures were undertaken by government since 1991: –
1.    Lowering SLR and CRR
·         The high SLR and CRR reduced the profits of the banks. The SLR had been reduced from 38.5% in 1991 to 25% in 1997.
·         The Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) is the cash ratio of banks total deposits to be maintained with RBI. The CRR had been brought down from 15% in 1991 to 4.1% in June 2003.
2.    Prudential Norms: –
·         Prudential norms have been started by RBI in order to impart professionalism in commercial banks. The purpose of prudential norms includes proper disclosure of income, classification of assets and provision for Bad debts so as to ensure that the books of commercial banks reflect the accurate and correct picture of financial position.
·         Prudential norms required banks to make 100% provision for all Non-performing Assets (NPAs).
3.    Capital Adequacy Norms (CAN): –
·         Capital Adequacy ratio is the ratio of minimum capital to risk asset ratio. In April 1992 RBI fixed CAN at 8%. By March 1996, all public sector banks had attained the ratio of 8%. It was also attained by foreign banks.
4.    Deregulation of Interest Rates
·         The Narasimhan Committee advocated that interest rates should be allowed to be determined by market forces. Since 1992, interest rates have become much simpler and freer.
·         Scheduled Commercial banks have now the freedom to set interest rates on their deposits subject to minimum floor rates and maximum ceiling rates.
·         The interest rate on domestic term deposits has been decontrolled.
·         The interest rates on deposits and advances of all Co-operative banks have been deregulated subject to a minimum lending rate.
5.    Recovery of Debts
·         The Government of India passed the “Recovery of debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act 1993” in order to facilitate and speed up the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions. Six Special Recovery Tribunals have been set up. An Appellate Tribunal has also been set up in Mumbai.
6.    Competition from New Private Sector Banks
·         Banking is open to the private sector.
·         New private sector banks have already started functioning. These new private sector banks are allowed to raise capital contribution from foreign institutional investors up to 20% and from NRIs up to 40%. This has led to increased competition.
7.    Access To Capital Market
·         The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act was amended to enable the banks to raise capital through public issues. This is subject to the provision that the holding of Central Government would not fall below 51% of paid-up-capital.
8.    Freedom of Operation
·         Scheduled Commercial Banks are given freedom to open new branches and upgrade extension counters, after attaining capital adequacy ratio and prudential accounting norms. The banks are also permitted to close non-viable branches other than in rural areas.
9.  Local Area Banks (LABs)
·         In 1996, RBI issued guidelines for setting up of Local Area Banks, and it gave Its approval for setting up of 7 LABs in private sector. LABs will help in mobilizing rural savings and in channelling them into investment in local areas.
10.  Supervision of Commercial Banks
·         The RBI has set up a Board of financial Supervision with an advisory Council to strengthen the supervision of banks and financial institutions. In 1993, RBI established a new department known as Department of Supervision as an independent unit for supervision of commercial banks.


Saturday, 9 November 2019

UGC NET/JRF Previous Year Questions 2013 June People Development & Environment.



Q7. The phrase 'tragedy of commons’ is in the context of
(A) tragic event related to damage caused by release of poisonous gases.       (B) tragic conditions of poor people.
(C) degradation of renewable free access resources                            (D) climate change      
Q8. Kyoto Protocol is related to
(A) Ozone depletion (B) Hazardous waste       (C) Climate change (D) Nuclear energy
Q9. Which of the following is a source of emissions leading to the eventual formation of surface ozone as a pollutant?
(A) Transport sector (B) Refrigeration and Air conditioning    (C) Wetlands (D) Fertilizers    
Q10. The smog in cities in India mainly consists of             
(A) Oxides Of sulphur                         (B) Oxides of nitrogen and unburnt hydrocarbons
(C) Carbon monoxide and SPM                       (D) Oxides of sulphur and ozone       
Q11. Which of the following types of natural hazards have the highest potential to cause damage to humans?
(A) Earth quakes (B) Forest fires         (C) Volcanic eruptions (D) Droughts and Floods                    
Q12. The percentage share of renewable energy sources in the power production in India is around
(A) 2-3 % (B) 22-25% (C) l0-12% (D) <1%   


For answers of above questions Please subscribe     You tube   channel

UGC NET/JRF Previous Year Questions 2012 December People Development & Environment.


2012 DEC
Q31. Which of the following is a source of methane?
(A) Wetlands (B) Foam Industry          (C) Thermal Power Plants (D) Cement Industry          
Q32. ‘Minamata disaster’ in Japan was caused by pollution due to
(A) Lead (B) Mercury  (C) Cadmium (D) Zinc
Q33. Biomagnification means increase in the                       
(A) concentration of pollutants in living organisms  (B) number of species   (C) size of living organisms (D) biomass
Q34. Nagoya Protocol is related to
(A) Climate change (B) Ozone depletion                     (C) Hazardous waste (D) Biodiversity
Q35. The second most important source after fossil fuels contributing to India’s energy needs is
(A) Solar energy (B) Nuclear energy    (C) Hydropower (D) Wind energy      
Q36. In case of earthquakes, an increase of magnitude 1 on Richter Scale implies
(A) a ten-fold increase in the amplitude of seismic waves.  (B) a ten-fold increase in the energy of the seismic waves.
(C) two-fold increase in the amplitude of seismic waves.    (D) two-fold increase in the energy of seismic waves.



For answers of above questions Please subscribe     You tube   channel

UGC NET/JRF Previous Year Questions 2012 June


2012 JUNE
Q31. Irritation in eyes is caused by the pollutant
(A) Sulphur di-oxide (B) Ozone  (C) PAN (D) Nitrous oxide 
Q32. Which is the source of chlorofluorocarbons?
(A) Thermal power plants        (B) Automobiles (C) Refrigeration and Air-conditioning         (D) Fertilizers
Q33. Which of the following is not a renewable natural resource?
(A) Clean air (B) Fertile soil     (C) Fresh water (D) Salt          
Q34. Which of the following parameters is not used as a pollution indicator in water?
(A) Total dissolved solids (B) Coliform count (C) Dissolved oxygen (D) Density      
Q35. S and P waves are associated with
(A) floods (B) wind energy      (C) earthquakes (D) tidal energy                     
Q36. Match Lists I and II and select the correct answer from the codes given below :
List – I                                    List – II
(i) Ozone hole                          (a) Tsunami
(ii) Greenhouse effect              (b) UV radiations
(iii) Natural hazards                 (c) Methane
(iv) Sustainable development   (d) Eco-centrism
Codes :
     (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)
(A) (b) (c) (a) (d)
(B) (c) (b) (a) (d)
(C) (d) (c) (a) (b)
(D) (d) (b) (c) (a)     

For answers of above questions Please subscribe     You tube   channel

Monday, 19 August 2019

Module III


Cadbury Report

It was established in May 1991 by The Financial Reporting Council, The London Stock Exchange, and the Accountancy Profession.
The Cadbury Report was oncereferred to as The Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspect Of
Corporate Governance
The report was published in December 1992, following the recommendations of the Cadbury Committee
Itaddresses concerns about The Working of Corporate Governance System. The committee made it its purpose to address the financial aspects of corporate governance and out of this produced a best code of best practice.
REASONS:
ü increasing lack of confidence of investors in the honesty and accountability of listed companies
ü financial collapse of listed corporations
ü auditors mispresentation of facts
ü lack of board accountability

Cadbury was the results of several high profiler companies collapse.it is concerned primarily with protecting weak and widely dispersed shareholders against self-interested directors and managers.
According To Cadbury Report On Corporate Governance Should Be Based On:

*    good board practice
*    control environment
*    transparent disclosure
*    well defined shareholders rights
*    board commitment

STRENGTHS

*    Creating confidence among shareholders, customers……
*    improve leadership
*    it triggered successive ways of rethinking

CONCLUSION:
Cadbury report was followed by 3 more major reports:
*    Green Bury(1995)
*    Hamper(1998)
*    Turn Bull(1999)

King Report 

INTRODUCTION

The King Report on Corporate Governance is a guideline for the governance structures and operation of companies in South Africa. It is issued by the King Committee on Corporate Governance. Three reports were issued in 1994, 2002 and 2009 going by the name King I, King II, King III successively. A fourth revision was made in 2016 known by King IV. The Institute of Directors in Southern Africa (IoDSA) owns the copyright of the King Report on Corporate Governance and the King Code of Corporate Governance. Companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange has to adhere to the King Code of Corporate Governance.The King Report on Corporate Governance has been cited as "the most effective summary of
the best international practices in corporate governance".
HISTORY AND APPROACH
      In July 1993 the Institute of Directors in South Africa asked retired Supreme Court of South Africa judge Mervyn E. King to chair a committee on corporate governance. He viewed this as an opportunity to educate the newly democratic South African public on the working of a free economy.
The committee's report was to be the first report of its kind in South Africa.
The king corporate governance code is non-legislative and is based on
principles and practices. It also espouses an apply or explain approach.
The philosophy of the code consists of the three key elements :
Leadership
Good governance means effective and ethical leadership.Leaders should direct the company to achieve sustainable economic, social and environmental performance.
Sustainability
It views sustainability as the primary moral and economic
imperative of this century.
● Good Corporate Citizenship.
The code's view on corporate citizenship flows from a company's standing as a juristic person under the South African constitution and should operate in a ssustainable manner.

KING I
In 1994 the first King report on corporate governance (King 1) was
published. It established recommended standards of conduct for boards
and directors of listed companies, banks, and certain state-owned
enterprises. It also involved all stakeholders.
It was applicable to :

● All companies listed on the main board of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange.
● Large public entities as defined by the Public Entities  Act of South Africa.
● Banks, financial and insurance companies as defined by the Financial Services Acts of South Africa.
● Large unlisted companies which included companies with shareholder equity over R50 million.


The key principles from the first King report covered:
● Board of directors makeup and mandate, including the role of non-executive directors and guidance on the categories of people who should make up the non-executive directors.
● Appointments to the board and guidance on the maximum term for executive directors
● Determination and disclosure of executive and non-executive director’s remuneration
● Board meeting frequency
● Balanced annual reporting
● The requirement for effective auditing
● Affirmative action programs
● The company’s code of ethics

KING II


In 2002, the report was revised (King II) including new sections on sustainability, the role of the corporate board, and risk management. This revised code of governance was applicable from March 2002. In addition to those types of organizations listed in King I, it was applicable
to :
● Departments of State or national, provincial or local government administration falling under the Local Government abiding to Municipal Finance Management Act.
● Public institution exercising a power or performing a function in terms of the constitution.
● Public institutions exercising a public power or performing a public function in terms of any legislation, excluding courts or judicial officers.


The key principles from the second King report covered the following areas:
● Directors and their responsibility
● Risk management
● Internal audit
● Integrated sustainability reporting
● Accounting and auditing
 the code is not enforced through legislation. But it co-exists with a number of laws like the Companies Act and JSE Securities Exchange Listings Requirements.

King III
According to King II report , leading companies reported with regard to sustainability separately from other factors. The 2009 King III report, governance, strategy and sustainability were integrated.The companies were recommended to create sustainability reports according to the Global Reporting Initiative's Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. In contrast to the earlier versions, King III is applicable to all entities, public, private and non-profit. The code of governance was applicable from March s2010.
The report incorporated a number of global emerging governance trends:

● Alternative dispute resolution
● Risk-based internal audit
● Shareholder approval of non-executive directors’ remuneration
● Evaluation of board and directors’ performance It also incorporated a number of

new principles to address elements not previously included in the King reports:

● IT governance
● Business Rescue
● Fundamental and affected transactions in terms of director’s ffdresponsibilities during mergers, acquisitions and amalgamations.

King IV

King IV builds on King III . It has been revised to :
● Bring it up to date with international governance codes and best ractice.
● To align it to shifts in the approach to capitalism.
● To take account of specific corporate governance developments in relation to effective governing bodies.
● Increased compliance requirements.
● To align to the new governance structures (e.g. Social and Ethics Committee)
● To align to the emerging risks and opportunities from new technologies and new reporting and disclosure requirements.


Key new or enhanced features of King IV relate to:

● Fair, responsible and transparent organisation wide remuneration.
● Responsible and transparent tax strategy and policy.
● Balanced composition of governing bodies and independence of members of the governing body.
● Delegation to management
● Delegation to committees.
● Corporate governance services to the governing body.
● Performance evaluations of the governing body.
● Audit committee disclosures.
● Risk governance.
● The combined assurance model.
● Social and ethics committees.
● Performance evaluations.
● Responsible institutional investors.
● Technology and information.

King IV was released on 1 November 2016. It is effective for financial
years commencing from 1 April 2017.

Conclusion
Companies have to adhere to King report for good governance as
essentially being effective, ethical leadership. King believes that leaders
should direct the company to achieve sustainable economic, social and
environmental performance.


Popular Posts